Long-Term Soil Productivity
The NFMA of 1976, Sec. 6 (g), part C, states that the USDA, through research and continuous monitoring, must ensure that the effects of each management system have no substantial and permanent impairment of the productivity of the land.So, in 1989, the NFS and FS Research partnered together to design and implement a nationwide, long-term study on the effects of forest management practices on long-term soil productivity.
The LTSP study in the South is 5-13 years old, which is the most critical time for research on site productivity. Much work has been done on early plantation productivity (less than 15 years), but not on stands well past canopy closure, which is when site quality begins to exert its greatest influence on stand growth and productivity.
Figure 1 | Graph of Stand Production VS Time in Years
The LTSP study was designed to answer the following questions:
- What is the inherent carrying capacity of a site?
- Is this capacity altered by management?
- If carrying capacity is degraded, can it be restored?
- How does soil disturbance affect soil functions?
- Can these processes be monitored with surrogates?
The founding principles of the study are that:
- Soil is the key factor controlling site productivity
- The fundamental measure of productivity is vegetative carrying capacity;all other uses dependent on forest
- Losses of organic matter and/or porosity most common causes of long-term productivity loss
- Past efforts to directly document productivity loss have been confounded by climate, weeds, stocking, management, etc.
The experimental design is a 3×3 factorial design with three levels of experimentally-induced soil compaction and three levels of organic matter removal. The three compaction levels were:
- None, in which no mechanical equipment was allowed on the plots;
- Moderate, which consisted of six passes of a wobble-wheel road compactor with 3.6 Mg of ballast;
- Severe, which consisted of six passes of the compactor with 6.4 Mg of ballast.
The organic matter removal treatments ranged from merchantable bole-only, where all tops were left on-site, to whole-tree, in which all tops were removed as well as boles, and complete removal, where all aboveground organic matter was removed (trees, understory, forest floor).
Each experimental plot was 0.4 ha in size and planted on a 2.5 X 2.5 m spacing. The main plots were split into two 0.2 ha split-plots, and one half was kept free from woody competition with manual removal and herbicides.
People in cleared area
Cleared area
People with large equipment
Image of a hole
Figure 3 | Map of LTSP Locations (each red star represents 3–4 locations)
| Location | Forest | Year Installed | Soil Series |
|---|---|---|---|
| LA 1 | Calcasieu RD, Kistachie NF, Louisiana | 1990 | Malbis |
| LA 2 | Catahoula RD, Kistachie NF, Louisiana | 1992 | Glenmora |
| LA 3 | Catahoula RD, Kistachie NF, Louisiana | 1993 | Metcalf |
| LA 4 | Catahoula RD, Kistachie NF, Louisiana | 1993 | Mayhew |
| MS 1,2,3 | Chickasawhay RD, DeSoto NF, Mississippi | 1994 | Freest |
| TX 1,2,3 | Davy Crockett NF, Texas | 1996 | Kurth |

