Ground cover in old-growth forests of the central hardwood region

This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document here.

  • Authors: Spetich, Martin A.; Shifley, Stephen R.; Parker, George R.; Ponder, Felix, Jr.
  • Publication Year: 1997
  • Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
  • Source: In: Pallardy, Stephen G.; Cecich, Robert A.; Garrett, H. Gene; Johnson, Paul S., eds. Proceedings of the 11th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-188. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station: 152-160

Abstract

Differences in ground cover (percent cover of litter, percent cover of vegetation and litter weight) in old-growth forests across this region are not well understood. We initiated a long-term study in a three-state region to enhance knowledge in this area. We present baseline results for ground cover and compare these data across productivity regions. Thirty 0.25-ac (0.1-ha) main plots and 120 subplots 27 ft² (2.5 m²) in size were established in each old-growth forest and used to inventory ground cover. We estimated percent cover of: bare ground, boles of woody vegetation, dead leaves, downed woody material, exposed rock, and herbaceous cover. In addition, 240 subplots 1.35 ft² (0.125 m²) in size were used to estimate dry weight of litter down to the mineral soil horizon. Trends among sites were compared to a regional productivity gradient. Across all sites, mean values for percent ground cover were: bare ground, 6% (SD 10%); boles of woody vegetation ≥3.3 ft tall, 2% (SD 1%); dead leaves and dead herbaceous vegetation, 85% (SD 10%); downed woody material, 5% (SD 1%); exposed rock, 1% (SD 2%); other, 1% (SD 2%). Mean litter weight across all sites was 6.8 tons/ac (SD 3.1 tons/ac) [15.3 metric tons/ha (SD 7 metric tons/ha)]. Differences in litter weight were not significant between northeast and southwest slopes. The inverse relationship of percent cover of exposed rock to regional productivity class was highly significant (R² = 0.88 for negative exponential model, p-value < 0.01). The positive linear relationship between litter weight and productivity class was also significant (R² = 0.55, p-value = 0.01).

  • Citation: Spetich, Martin A.; Shifley, Stephen R.; Parker, George R.; Ponder, Felix, Jr. 1997. Ground cover in old-growth forests of the central hardwood region. In: Pallardy, Stephen G.; Cecich, Robert A.; Garrett, H. Gene; Johnson, Paul S., eds. Proceedings of the 11th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-188. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station: 152-160
  • Posted Date: February 1, 2007
  • Modified Date: February 1, 2007
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.