Operational forest stream crossings effects on water quality in the Virginia Piedmont

  • Authors: Aust, Wallace M.; Carroll, Matthew B.; Bolding, M. Chad; Dolloff, Andy
  • Publication Year: 2011
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 35(3):123-130

Abstract

Water quality indices were examined for paired upstream and downstream samples for 23 operational stream crossings and approaches during four periods. Stream crossings were (1) portable bridges (BRIDGE), (2) culverts backfilled with poles (POLE), (3) culverts with earth backfill (CULVERT), and (4) reinforced fords (FORD). The four operational periods were (1) prior to crossing installation (INITIAL), (2) after installation (INSTALL), (3) during harvest (HARVEST), and (4) after road closure (CLOSURE). Differences (?) in water samples collected above and below stream crossings were analyzed for ?total dissolved solids (?TDS), ?pH, ?conductivity, ?temperature, and ?sediment concentration. Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design with unequal replication (four to seven replications). Significant differences were observed (a < 0.10) among crossing types for ?temperature, ?TDS, ?pH, and ?conductivity. Overall, the least disruptive crossing type for water quality was BRIDGE, but road standards and approach characteristics were also important. Modeled estimates of erosion demonstrated that CULVERT approaches had higher potential erosion than other crossings. Water quality parameters were most negatively affected during INSTALL and HARVEST and were apparently improving during CLOSURE. Permanent crossings were associated with significantly greater temperatures than temporary crossings, likely because of increased width of streamside management zone removal. Water quality effects could be minimized by installing appropriate best management practices during all harvest periods rather than waiting until CLOSURE. Findings should be used cautiously because individual site factors such as climate, site, soil, and operational variability will alter effects.

  • Citation: Aust, Wallace M.; Carroll, Matthew B.; Bolding, M. Chad; Dolloff, C. Andrew. 2011. Operational forest stream crossings effects on water quality in the Virginia Piedmont. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 35(3):123-130.
  • Keywords: forest roads, stream crossings, water quality, forestry best management practices
  • Posted Date: September 6, 2011
  • Modified Date: September 12, 2011
  • Requesting Print Publications

    Publication requests are subject to availability. Fiscal responsibility limits the hardcopies of publications we produce and distribute. Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, distributed and printed.

    Please make any requests at pubrequest@fs.fed.us.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.