Quantifying the net economic benefits of mechanical wildfire hazard treatments on timberlands of the western United States

  • Authors: Prestemon, Jeffrey P.; Abt, Karen L.; Barbour, James R.
  • Publication Year: 2012
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: Forest Policy and Economics 21:44-53

Abstract

Mechanical treatment of vegetation is done on public and private lands for many possible reasons, including enhancing wildlife habitat, increasing timber growth of residual stands, and improving resistance to damaging pests. Few studies, however, have focused on the circumstances under which mechanical wildfire hazard reduction treatments can yield positive net economic wildfire benefits for landowners and managers. This study describes an economic assessment tool built from a representative area sample frame inventory of hazardous and potentially treatable timberland in twelve western states of the U.S. Base case parameter assumptions about values at risk, timber product prices, stand re-growth following treatment and wildfire impacts enable an initial estimate of the amount of timberland with positive discounted expected net economic benefits under four policy scenarios. These assumptions are then varied in a Monte Carlo simulation to provide some bounds of uncertainty around base case levels. A policy that allowed optimal prescriptions and product sales and which incorporates wildfire costs and benefits would result in more than 25% of treated area with positive net benefits. This is reduced somewhat if wildfire reduction costs and benefits are not considered, and reduced again to 14% when large trees are excluded from product sales. A policy that prohibits sale of products from these treatments results in less than 1% of area with positive net benefits. Published by Elsevier B.V.

  • Citation: Prestemon, Jeffrey P.; Abt, Karen L.; Barbour, James R. 2012. Quantifying the net economic benefits of mechanical wildfire hazard treatments on timberlands of the western United States. Forest Policy and Economics 21:44-53.
  • Keywords: Fuel, Timber, Products, Wildland–urban interface, Monte Carlo
  • Posted Date: July 10, 2012
  • Modified Date: January 14, 2013
  • Requesting Print Publications

    Publication requests are subject to availability. Fiscal responsibility limits the hardcopies of publications we produce and distribute. Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, distributed and printed.

    Please make any requests at pubrequest@fs.fed.us.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.