Are we over-managing longleaf pine?

This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document here.

  • Authors: Kush, John S.; Barlow, Rebecca J.; Gilbert, John C.
  • Publication Year: 2012
  • Publication Series: Paper (invited, offered, keynote)
  • Source: In: Butnor, John R., ed. 2012. Proceedings of the 16th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-156. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 173-176.

Abstract

Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) is not loblolly (Pinus taeda L.) or slash pine (Pinus elliottii L.). There is the need for a paradigmatic shift in our thinking about longleaf pine. All too often we think of longleaf as an intolerant species, slow-grower, difficult to regenerate, and yet it dominated the pre-settlement Southeastern forest; how can that be? Wahlenberg, in his 1946 book about longleaf pine, wrote that mismanagement of longleaf pine has been the rule rather than the exception, due to the ignorance of the unique life history and incomplete knowledge of factors determining the life and death of seedlings and hence the succession of forest types. Using data from the Regional Longleaf Growth Study and from what had been a virgin stand of longleaf pine, the Flomaton Natural Area, this presentation will focus on examining data from areas that have been/were allowed to grow “unmanaged”, i.e. no timber cutting. How did longleaf pine stay on the landscape before we almost managed it out of existence?

  • Citation: Kush, John S.; Barlow, Rebecca J.; Gilbert, John C. 2012. Are we over-managing longleaf pine? In: Butnor, John R., ed. 2012. Proceedings of the 16th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-156. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 173-176.
  • Posted Date: August 31, 2012
  • Modified Date: August 31, 2012
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.