Effect of Bioenergy Demands and Supply Response on Markets, Carbon, and Land Use

  • Authors: Abt, Karen L.; Abt, Robert C.; Galik, Christopher
  • Publication Year: 2012
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: Forest Science 58(5):523-539

Abstract

An increase in the demand for wood for energy, including liquid fuels, bioelectricity, and pellets, has the potential to affect traditional wood users, forestland uses, management intensities, and, ultimately, carbon sequestration. Recent studies have shown that increases in bioenergy harvests could lead to displacement of traditional wood-using industries in the short run and intensive management, land use change, and sawtimber market impacts in the long-run. We simulate timber markets, as well as land use response and carbon outcomes resulting from projections of both traditional and bioenergy wood use in Alabama, Georgia, and Florida under differing levels of market supply responses. Increased logging residue recovery had a moderating effect on prices, although increased planting response led to higher carbon sequestration, and smaller effects on prices. Increased forest productivity led to lower prices, but also led to reduced timberland and thus lower forest carbon sequestration. Supply responses will be crucial to moderating market responses to increases in bioenergy wood demands.

  • Citation: Abt, Karen L.; Abt, Robert C.; Galik, Christopher 2012. Effect of Bioenergy Demands and Supply Response on Markets, Carbon, and Land Use. Forest Science 58(5):523-539.
  • Keywords: woody biomass, timber supply, timber demand, logging residue, carbon sequestration
  • Posted Date: November 19, 2012
  • Modified Date: November 19, 2012
  • Requesting Print Publications

    Publication requests are subject to availability. Fiscal responsibility limits the hardcopies of publications we produce and distribute. Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, distributed and printed.

    Please make any requests at pubrequest@fs.fed.us.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.