Production Economics of Private Forestry: A Comparison of Industrial and Nonindustrial Forest Owners

  • Authors: Newman, David H.; Wear, David N.
  • Publication Year: 1993
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: Amer. J. Agr. Econ.
  • DOI: 10.2307/1243574


This paper compares the producrion behavior of industrial and nonindustrial private forestland owners in the southeastern U.S. using a restricted profit function. Profits are modeled as a function of two outputs, sawtimber and pulpwood. one variable input, regeneration effort. and two quasi-fixed inputs, land and growing stock. Although an identical profit function is rejected, the results indicate behavior consistent with pmfit-maximizing motives under both ownerships. The two ownerships have similar responses to input and output price changes, both in the short-run and in the long-run. However, nonindustrial owners appear to place a higher value on their standing timber and forestland than do industrial owners. The difference in estimated shadow values indicates that significant nonmarket benefits are being captured by nonindustrial owners and the benefits are reflected in their production behavior.

  • Citation: Newman, David H.; Wear, David N. 1993. Production Economics of Private Forestry: A Comparison of Industrial and Nonindustrial Forest Owners. Amer.J. Agr. Econ. 75 (3): 674-684
  • Keywords: duality, forest production. restricted profit functions. timber supply and demand elasticities
  • Posted Date: January 1, 2000
  • Modified Date: October 11, 2018
  • Requesting Print Publications

    Publication requests are subject to availability. Fiscal responsibility limits the hardcopies of publications we produce and distribute. Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, distributed and printed.

    Please make any requests at

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.