The effect of personal experience on choice-based preferences for wildfire protection programs

  • Authors: Holmes , Tom; Gonzalez-Caban, Armando; Loomis, John; Sanchez, Jose
  • Publication Year: 2013
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: International Journal of Wildland Fire 22(2): 234-245
  • DOI: 10.1071/WF11182

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate homeowner preferences and willingness to pay for wildfire protection programs using a choice experiment with three attributes: risk, loss and cost. Preference heterogeneity among survey respondents was examined using three econometric models and risk preferences were evaluated by comparing willingness to pay for wildfire protection programs against expected monetary losses. The results showed that while nearly all respondents had risk seeking preferences, a small segment of respondents were risk neutral or risk averse. Only respondents who had personal experience with the effects of wildfire consistently made trade-offs among risk, loss and cost and these respondents were willing to pay more for wildfire protection programs than were respondents without prior experience of the effects of wildfire. The degree to which people with prior experience with the effects of wildfire can effectively articulate an economic rationale for investing in wildfire protection to other members of their own or other communities facing the threat of wildfires may influence the overall success of wildfire protection programs.

  • Citation: Holmes Thomas P., González-Cabán Armando; Loomis, John; Sánchez, José. 2013. The effect of personal experience on choice-based preferences for wildfire protection programs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22(2): 234-245.
  • Keywords: expected utility, heuristics, natural disasters, prospect theory, risk aversion, risk seeking.
  • Posted Date: November 18, 2013
  • Modified Date: October 6, 2016
  • Requesting Print Publications

    Publication requests are subject to availability. Fiscal responsibility limits the hardcopies of publications we produce and distribute. Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, distributed and printed.

    Please make any requests at pubrequest@fs.fed.us.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.