Thickness and roughness measurements for air-dried longleaf pine bark

This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document here.

  • Authors: Eberhardt, Thomas L.
  • Publication Year: 2015
  • Publication Series: Proceedings - Paper (PR-P)
  • Source: In Proceedings of the 17th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e–Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–203. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 6 p.

Abstract

Bark thicknesses for longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) were investigated using disks collected from trees harvested on a 70-year-old plantation. Maximum inner bark thickness was relatively constant along the tree bole whereas maximum outer bark thickness showed a definite decrease from the base of the tree to the top. The minimum whole bark thickness followed the same trend as the inner bark thickness while maximum whole bark thickness followed the same trend as the outer bark thickness. Greater bark thicknesses were observed along the northern face of the tree bole. Minimum/maximum whole bark thickness ratios, used as a measure of bark roughness, were fairly constant from the base of the tree up to a relative height near 60 percent; increasing values further up the bole reflected decreasing bark roughness. Comparisons of the data from the northern and southern faces suggested asymmetries in bark roughness around the circumference. Altogether, results demonstrate intriguing aspects of longleaf pine bark variability along the tree bole and in the four cardinal directions.

  • Citation: Eberhardt, Thomas L. 2015. Thickness and roughness measurements for air-dried longleaf pine bark. In Proceedings of the 17th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e–Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–203. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 6 p.
  • Posted Date: February 11, 2015
  • Modified Date: November 12, 2020
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.