Crown expansion following thinning in naturally regenerated and planted longleaf pine

This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document here.

  • Authors: Jack, Steven B.; Jansen, Noah A.; Mitchell, Robert J.
  • Publication Year: 2015
  • Publication Series: Proceedings - Paper (PR-P)
  • Source: In Proceedings of the 17th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e–Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–203. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 3 p.

Abstract

The recent focus on restoration of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) forests has frequently led to planting longleaf pine on old-field and cutover sites. While many perceptions regarding response of longleaf pine to management are based upon measurements in naturally regenerated stands, it is generally observed that crown development in planted longleaf stands is dissimilar to that observed in natural stands; that is, planted longleaf pine trees tend to have more branches and wider, more “full” crowns at young ages in comparison to naturally regenerated trees. Many planted longleaf stands are reaching the size and age for thinning and with these observed differences in crown characteristics, it is important to explore further whether the response of tree crowns in plantations differs from that of naturally regenerated trees. Few (if any) published studies other than Minor (1951), however, have examined crown dimensions of individual longleaf pine trees as influenced by stand characteristics.

  • Citation: Jack, Steven B.; Jansen, Noah A.; Mitchell, Robert J. 2015. Crown expansion following thinning in naturally regenerated and planted longleaf pine. In Proceedings of the 17th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e–Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–203. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 3 p.
  • Posted Date: February 11, 2015
  • Modified Date: February 12, 2015
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.