Approximation of the breast height diameter distribution of two-cohort stands by mixture models II Goodness-of-fit tests

  • Authors: Podlaski, Rafal; Roesch, Francis .A.
  • Publication Year: 2013
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: Sylwan. 157(9):652-661

Abstract

The goals of this study are (1) to analyse the accuracy of the approximation of empirical distributions of diameter at breast height (dbh) using two-component mixtures of either the Weibull distribution or the gamma distribution in two−cohort stands, and (2) to discuss the procedure of choosing goodness−of−fit tests. The study plots were located in the Świętokrzyski National Park (central Poland) and in the Southern Appalachian Mountains (eastern USA). The results of the goodness-of-fit tests (chi-squared, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramér-von Mises, and Anderson-Darling), normalised bias and normalised root mean square error, indicate that dbh empirical distributions of two-cohort stands are compatible with the mixture models investigated. The chi-squared test and the generalization of the Anderson-Darling test to discrete distributions should be used to assess whether empirical dbh data are consistent with a hypothesized ' distribution.

  • Citation: Podlaski, Rafal; Roesch, Francis .A. 2013. Approximation of the breast height diameter distribution of two-cohort stands by mixture models II Goodness-of-fit tests. Sylwan. 157(9):652-661. 10 p.
  • Keywords: Two-component mixtures, tree diameter distribution nonparametric goodness-of-it tests, discrete ' distribution.
  • Posted Date: September 25, 2014
  • Modified Date: May 14, 2015
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.