Quantifying and mapping spatial variability in simulated forest plots

This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document here.

  • Authors: Corral, Gavin R.; Burkhart, Harold E.
  • Publication Year: 2016
  • Publication Series: Proceedings - Paper (PR-P)
  • Source: In: Proceedings of the 18th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-212. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 614 p.

Abstract

We used computer simulations to test the efficacy of multivariate statistical methods to detect, quantify, and map spatial variability of forest stands. Simulated stands were developed of regularly-spaced plantations of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). We assumed no affects of competition or mortality, but random variability was added to individual tree characteristics. The purpose of simulating stands without these complex interactions was to provide a controlled situation to measure the efficacy of our methods. We examined redundancy analysis, partial redundancy analysis, and spatially constrained cluster analysis for detecting spatial patterns and found that redundancy analysis and partial redundancy analysis were reliable methods to quantify and test spatial dependence, respectively. Spatially constrained cluster analysis had moderate success in mapping variability, but its application to more complex situations may be limited.

  • Citation: Corral, Gavin R.; Burkhart, Harold E. 2016. Quantifying and mapping spatial variability in simulated forest plots. In: Proceedings of  the 18th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-212. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 5 p.
  • Posted Date: March 25, 2016
  • Modified Date: March 25, 2016
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.