Simulation of design-unbiased point-to-particle sampling compared to alternatives on plantation rows

This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document here.

  • Authors: Lynch, Thomas B.; Hamlin, David; Ducey, Mark J.
  • Publication Year: 2016
  • Publication Series: Proceedings - Paper (PR-P)
  • Source: In:Proceedings of the 18th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-212. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 614 p.

Abstract

Total quantities of tree attributes can be estimated in plantations by sampling on plantation rows using several methods. At random sample points on a row, either fixed row lengths or variable row lengths with a fixed number of sample trees can be assessed. Ratio of means or mean of ratios estimators can be developed for the fixed number of trees option but are not designunbiased. Ducey’s estimator samples a fixed number of trees and is design-unbiased, as is sampling fixed row length. Simulations indicted that some of the ratio estimators could have substantial bias on rows containing large gaps, but for other ratio estimators bias was minimal in practical terms. Ducey’s method is unbiased but had a root mean square error slightly larger than some of the ratio estimators.

  • Citation: Lynch, Thomas B.; Hamlin, David; Ducey, Mark J. 2016. Simulation of design-unbiased point-to-particle sampling compared to alternatives on plantation rows. In:Proceedings of the 18th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-212. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 2 p.
  • Posted Date: April 28, 2016
  • Modified Date: April 28, 2016
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.