Impacts of forest biomass removal on water yield across the United States

  • Authors: Sun, Ge; Zhang, Liangxia; Duan, Kai; Rau, Benjamin
  • Publication Year: 2017
  • Publication Series: Book Chapter
  • Source: In: R. A. Efroymson, M. H. Langholtz, K.E. Johnson, and B. J. Stokes (Eds.), 2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy, Volume 2: Environmental Sustainability Effects of Select Scenarios from Volume 1. ORNL/TM-2016/727. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN
  • DOI: 10.2172/1338837

Abstract

Water is essential to all forms of life on earth and is a powerful, integrated indicator of environmental health and ecosystem sustainability (Asbjornsen et al. 2015). In some areas of the United States, water availability and water quality are declining as a result of urbanization, climate change, and increased water demand for agricul- tural irrigation, power generation, and domestic water use (Sun et al. 2008). Forest hydrological studies across the United States and around the world in the past century (Vose et al. 2011) show that forests greatly influence water quantity and quality. Forests play an important role in regulating the quantity, quality, and timing of water yield from watersheds—and, thus, in maintaining the ecosystems that depend on water (Edwards, Williard, and Schoonover 2015). It is estimated that over half of the water supply from the United States is provided by domestic forestlands (Brown, Hobbins, and Ramirez 2008; Sun, Caldwell, and McNulty 2015); therefore, forest management—such as reforestation/afforestation, tree harvesting, stand thinning, and other forest management practices—can influence watershed water yield (i.e., outflow from a drainage basin) by altering the terrestrial hydrological cycle. This cycle involves precipitation, evapotranspiration (ET), infiltration, soil moisture dynamics, and streamflow (Sun, Caldwell, and McNulty 2015; Stednick 1996; Christopher, Schoenholtz, and Nettles 2015). For example, deforestation generally elevates total streamflow and peak flow rates due to the reduction of ET caused by the removal of forest canopies (Brown et al. 2013), decrease in soil infiltration capacity as a result of soil compaction (Bruijnzeel 2004), and forest road construction (Edwards and Williard 2010). In contrast, afforestation or reforestation generally decreases watershed water yield because ET increases as a result of in- crease in water use by trees that have greater biomass both above- and belowground than vegetation in previous land uses (Sun et al. 2010; Brown et al. 2005).

  • Citation: Sun, Ge.;Zhang, Liangxia;Duan, Kai;Rau, Benjamin 2017. Impacts of forest biomass removal on water yield across the United States. In: R. A. Efroymson, M. H. Langholtz, K.E. Johnson, and B. J. Stokes (Eds.), 2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy, Volume 2: Environmental Sustainability Effects of Select Scenarios from Volume 1. ORNL/TM-2016/727. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. 640p. doi 10.2172/1338837
  • Posted Date: March 16, 2017
  • Modified Date: March 20, 2017
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.