Identification and discrimination of herbicide residues using a conducting polymer electronic nose

  • Authors: Wilson, Alphus Dan
  • Publication Year: 2016
  • Publication Series: Paper (invited, offered, keynote)
  • Source: Proceedings of the VII International Conference on Sensor Device Technologies and Applications, Nice, France, International Academy, Research, and Industry Association (IARIA), ISBN: 978-1-61208-494-7

Abstract

The identification of herbicide residues on crop foliage is necessary to make crop-management decisions for weed pest control and to monitor pesticide residue levels on food crops. Electronic-nose (e-nose) methods were tested as a cheaper, alternative means of discriminating between herbicide residue types (compared with conventional chromatography methods), by detection of headspace volatiles released from inert surfaces. Detection methods were developed for a conducting polymer (CP)-type electronic nose device, the Aromascan A32S, to identify and discriminate among eight herbicide types from five different herbicide chemical classes including: chlorophenoxy acids, cyclohexenones, dinitroanilines, organoarsenics, and phosphonoglycines. A herbicide-specific aroma signature library was developed from known herbicide residues. The A32S e-nose effectively distinguished between eight different herbicide residues, correctly identifying them at frequencies ranging from 81-98%. The distribution of aroma class components, based on artificial neural net (ANN) training and analysis, indicated the percentage membership of aroma classes shared by herbicide types. Principal component analysis (PCA) provided indications of the relatedness of herbicide types based on sensor array response patterns (aroma profiles) of individual herbicides. PCA generated precise statistical values (quality factors of significance) as numerical indications of chemical relatedness between herbicides based on pairwise comparisons of headspace volatiles from individual herbicide types. The potential applications and advantages of e-nose methods (over current chromatography methods) for the detection and identification of herbicide residues on crop surfaces in agronomic fields are discussed.

  • Citation: Wilson, Alphus Dan 2016. Identification and discrimination of herbicide residues using a conducting polymer electronic nose. SENSORDEVICES 6 p.
  • Keywords: artifician olfaction; electronic aroma detection; e-nose; pesticide residue detection; volatile organic compounds.
  • Posted Date: August 23, 2017
  • Modified Date: December 4, 2017
  • Requesting Print Publications

    Publication requests are subject to availability. Fiscal responsibility limits the hardcopies of publications we produce and distribute. Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, distributed and printed.

    Please make any requests at pubrequest@fs.fed.us.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.