Comparison of two diameter-based measures for estimation of stand carrying capacityThis article is part of a larger document. View the larger document here.
Diameter-based maximum size-density measures are useful to estimate stand basal area carrying capacity. In this study, we used an alternate formulation of relative spacing by replacing average dominant tree height with quadratic mean diameter, denoted diameter-based relative spacing (RSD). We compared the efficacy of RSD and Reineke’s (1933) self-thinning rule for estimation of stand basal area carrying capacity. Data from a loblolly pine spacing trial, with planting density ranging from 6727 to 747 trees/ha, were used to estimate the coefficients of both measures. RSD largely eliminated the undesirable property of Reineke’s self-thinning rule, which overestimated the maximum stand basal area when stands were young.
Requesting Print Publications
Publication requests are subject to availability. Fiscal responsibility limits the hardcopies of publications we produce and distribute. Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, distributed and printed.
Please make any requests at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.