Exploring diversity in forest management outlooks of African American family forest landowners for ensuring sustainability of forestry resources in the southern United States

  • Authors: Goyke, Noah; Dwivedi, Puneet; Hitchner, Sarah; Schelhas, John; Thomas, Marc
  • Publication Year: 2019
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: Human Ecology
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10745-019-0068-5

Abstract

African American forest landowners in the southern United States (US) are typically considered a homogenous group in current studies. Our research challenges this assumption by identifying four distinct forest management outlooks among African American forest landowners using Q Method. Sustainable Harvesters focus on balanced land use with a long-term outlook; Back 40ers appreciate the presence of forests on their property but focus on alternative land use; Land Use Pragmatists are also interested in alternative land use and primarily view forest as an economic resource; Recreationalists value their forestland not for economic value but as a place for personal use. Finally, Indecisive landowners are not sure about how to best manage their forestland.We argue that an understanding of different forest management outlooks will improve sustainable forest management by better targeting extension and outreach efforts for African American forest landowners.

  • Citation: Goyke, Noah; Dwivedi, Puneet; Hitchner, Sarah; Schelhas, John; Thomas, Marc. 2019. Exploring diversity in forest management outlooks of African American family forest landowners for ensuring sustainability of forestry resources in the southern United States. Human Ecology. 47(2): 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-0068-5.
  • Keywords: African American, Forest management, Q Method, Rural extension and outreach, Southern United States
  • Posted Date: September 10, 2019
  • Modified Date: January 16, 2020
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.