Trees and trash: Examining the link between urban forest engagement and blight in Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Abstract

Research conducted in various contexts suggests that urban greenspace, primarily trees, helps to reduce crime rates and other negative aspects of place. This study contributes to that literature by examining residents’ reporting of activities they do to create, maintain, and protect the urban forest in Atlanta, Georgia (USA), and the association of this involvement with seven inventoried blight indicators and two indicators of blight identified by residents, which included lack of code enforcement. Using binary logistic regression, we found that urban forest engagement was negatively associated only with litter. Rather, residence in predominantly African American communities was the most consistent predictor of more substantial indicators of blight, and lack of code enforcement. Except for litter, these are overwhelming conditions, often involving absentee property owners. Redress requires municipal-level, bureaucratic interventions, which can be complex. Urban forest engagement appears relatively ineffectual in combating the most egregious kind of blight but may aid in reducing more pedestrian forms.

  • Citation: Gaither, Cassandra Johnson; Kuehler, Eric; Zipperer, Wayne; Aka, Ebenezer O.; Barger, Brian. 2019. Trees and Trash: Examining the Link Between Urban Forest Engagement and Blight in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. Human Ecology Review, Volume 25, Number 2. 91-115.
  • Keywords: Atlanta, blight, environmental justice, urban forest
  • Posted Date: September 19, 2020
  • Modified Date: September 22, 2020
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.