Beyond the math: Case studies of Black forest landowners in Georgia, United States

  • Authors: Hitchner, Sarah; Goyke, Noah; Thomas, Marc; Schelhas, John; Dwivedi, Puneet
  • Publication Year: 2021
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: Journal of Sustainable Forestry
  • DOI: 10.1080/10549811.2021.2010573


Economic analyses of forest management options can help landowners make informed decisions. However, landowners make decisions in complex and nuanced ways that transcend economics. The history and legal status of their land, their emotional connections to it, their access to knowledge and capital, and their broader objectives are vital elements in their decision-making processes. We present case studies of four Black landowners in Georgia through a combination of economic analyses that compare their current revenue with potential increased revenue through active forest management and qualitative interviews that provide context for past management decisions and insights into why active forest management may – or may – not prove to be their ultimate goal. Together these two types of analysis present a range of goals and management options that consider both economic and non-economic valuations of forested lands, which can inform extension and outreach strategies for increasing engagement of Black landowners in sustainable fores

  • Citation: Hitchner, Sarah; Goyke, Noah; Thomas, Marc; Schelhas, John; Dwivedi, Puneet. 2021. Beyond the Math: Case Studies of Black Forest Landowners in Georgia, United States. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 51(6): 1-12.
  • Keywords: Black landowners, minority, landowners, family, landowners, forest, management, forest values, heirs property, taxes
  • Posted Date: August 30, 2022
  • Modified Date: August 31, 2022
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.