Behavior and sensitivity of an optimal tree diameter growth model under data uncertainty

  • Authors: Bragg, Don C.
  • Publication Year: 2005
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: Environmental Modelling and Software 20 (2005) 1225-1238

Abstract

Using loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, white oak, and northern red oak as examples, this paper considers the behavior of potential relative increment (PRI) models of optimal tree diameter growth under data uncertainity. Recommendations on intial sample size and the PRI iteractive curve fitting process are provided. Combining different state inventories prior to PRI model development increased sample size and diameter class representation while regionalizing the models. Differences arose between loblolly and shortleaf pine in both the contribution from each state inventory pool and the number of points used in the final model fitting. Generally, pooled models predicted the highest overall increment. Natural-origin loblolly pine produced a significantly different PRI model than planted loblolly. PRI curves for northern red oak in the Lake States and the Midsouth varied across the range of diameters considered, suggesting that widespread geographic differences in optimal performance may be present within a species. The PRI methodology is consistent with current theories on diameter growth and compares favorably with other model designs.

  • Citation: Bragg, Don C. 2005. Behavior and sensitivity of an optimal tree diameter growth model under data uncertainty. Environmental Modelling and Software 20 (2005) 1225-1238
  • Keywords: Potential relative increment, ecological model, Pinus taeda, Pinus echinata, Quercus alba, Quercus rubra, Eastwide Forest Inventory Data Base (EFIDB)
  • Posted Date: April 1, 1980
  • Modified Date: February 19, 2008
  • Requesting Print Publications

    Publication requests are subject to availability. Fiscal responsibility limits the hardcopies of publications we produce and distribute. Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, distributed and printed.

    Please make any requests at pubrequest@fs.fed.us.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.